CT 111 (tdunna, 192.168.68.129) is Theo's box and is report-only per the captain
(2026-08-17, re-confirmed 2026-09-10). The contract defined AMBER as 'GC scheduled
for next run' and its Execution loop called gc-executor for EVERY threat with no
guest-level exclusion - so a single AMBER reading there would have scheduled apt
clean / journal vacuum / log+tmp deletion against someone else's box. The only
marker was frontmatter report_only_agents, which names an AGENT while the scan unit
is a GUEST.
- Gate the Execution loop on a guest/host-keyed report_only_guests block (guest id,
hostname and IP all match); an excluded guest is alerted and skipped, so no
gc-executor call is constructed for it at any level.
- Carry the ruling in the contract body next to the loop, not only in frontmatter.
- scripts/disk-gc-plan.py: executable planner that reads the contract's
authoritative exclusion block and emits the action plan; tests/ covers it.
- Correct the stale fleet map against pvesh /cluster/resources: CT 105 -> amdpve
(was minipve), CT 111 -> storepve (was amdpve), add guests 118/119/120, and fix
the '15 CTs' counts (20 guests: 17 LXC + 3 QEMU VMs).
- scripts/pct-run.sh: same stale map (105/111 wrong node, 120 missing) - this is
why pct-run 111/105 failed.
- Fold in disk-gc-ct100-probe-gap-20260911: CT 100 verifiably works through
pct-run now that the map is correct; documented that the scanner must probe it
like any other guest, never via a local-only path (the scanner runs inside CT 100).
