Rule 5 now treats internal http://192.168.68.116/v1 as non-canonical
but working (authenticated via nginx), producing a WARNING instead of a
FAILURE. The canonical internal path /litellm/v1 and the public host
https://litellm.sysloggh.net/v1 both PASS. Everything else FAILS.
Prose aligned: hermes-key-enforcement.prose.md now states the canonical
internal form, notes that internal /v1 still works but is flagged as
non-canonical (WARN not FAIL), and clarifies that the public host serves
/v1 ONLY (404 on /litellm/v1). Corrected the 'unauthenticated path'
wording at line 116, which was factually wrong.
Tests updated: BASE template uses canonical internal path; new test
cases prove canonical /litellm/v1 PASSES, wrong path FAILS, public host
PASSES, and internal /v1 WARNS (not FAILS). Fixed backwards comment in
test_old_rule5_check_would_fail_canonical.
Rule 5 in audit-hermes-config.py had an inverted check: it expected
base_url=http://192.168.68.116/v1, but the contract hermes-key-enforcement.prose.md
names http://192.168.68.116/litellm/v1 as CORRECT/CANONICAL in multiple places.
The audit script would FAIL a config using the contract's canonical internal path
and PASS one using a path the contract does not name.
Fix: Rule 5 now accepts the canonical internal base (http://192.168.68.116/litellm/v1)
AND the public base (https://litellm.sysloggh.net/v1), and FAILS anything else.
The internal nginx serves both /litellm/v1 and /v1; the public host serves /v1 only
(per 2026-09-19 probe from CT 116).
Tests aligned: BASE template updated to use the canonical internal path, and new
test cases added to prove the canonical internal path PASSES, a wrong path FAILS,
and the public host path PASSES.